Free Shipping on orders over $99 | FREE 365-DAY RETURNS
Filters Fast Logo Header

#1 Online filtration retailer in the US!

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best way to get rid of the following?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best way to get rid of the following?

    Hi all,

    I've been doing a lot of research on water filters. It seems like it's come down to either: Fluoride Removal>KDF/GAC>0.5 Micron Carbon Block or RO with a 0.5 Micron Carbon Block to reduce VOCs. Based on this report for where I live can someone tell me which method would be better? http://projects.nytimes.com/toxic-wa...5-east-bay-mud

    If I can get the simple under the sink filters to deal with this problem as effectively as possible then I'll do that, as RO is more difficult to maintain and wastes water etc, but of course having clean water for health is the primary concern, so I'll do what I have to do to achieve that.

    Thanks!

  • #2
    I can't get your link to load. What condition(s) exactly are you trying to treat ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for the reply. Strange that it's not loading. I just clicked on it from this forum and it opened in a new tab/window for me.

      Here is another link to the study with maybe more detailed information: http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/whatsin...y-mud/0110005/

      I'll try to copy and paste from the NY Times page here:

      3 contaminants below legal limits, but above health guidelines

      In some states a small percentage of tests were performed before water was treated, and some contaminants were subsequently removed or diluted. As a result, some reported levels of contamination may be higher than were present at the tap.
      Number of Tests
      Contaminant Average result Maximum result Health limit Legal limit Total
      # Positive result Above health Above legal Monthly Testing History Chart key at top of page E.P.A. regulated
      Alpha particle activity 0.78 pCi/L 0.92 - 15 2 2 2 0 Yes
      Radium-226 0.15 pCi/L 0.23 0.05 5 2 2 2 0 Yes
      Radium-228 0.04 pCi/L 0.07 0.02 5 2 1 1 0 Yes
      9 contaminants found within health guidelines and legal limits
      Number of Tests
      Contaminant Average result Maximum result Health limit Legal limit Total
      # Positive result Above health Above legal Monthly Testing History Chart key at top of page E.P.A. regulated
      Aluminum 9.76 ppb 160 - - 210 42 0 0 No
      Beryllium (total) 0.02 ppb 1.38 4 4 143 3 0 0 Yes
      Combined Uranium (pCi/L) 0.03 pCi/L 0.07 15 15 2 1 0 0 Yes
      Gross beta particle activity (pCi/L) 1.77 pCi/L 2.82 15 15 2 2 0 0 Yes
      Manganese 0.05 ppb 22.70 300 - 212 1 0 0 No
      Nitrate 0.00 ppm 0.50 10 10 204 1 0 0 Yes
      Nitrate & nitrite 0.01 ppm 0.49 10 10 204 7 0 0 Yes
      Total haloacetic acids (HAAs) 16 ppb 16 70 60 1 1 0 0 Yes
      Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) 28 ppb 28 - 80 1 1 0 0 Yes

      Comment


      • #4
        From this site, go to the home page and look under point of use filtration. Then take a look at Watts under sink filtration stuff, including RO filtration. Very easy to install and maintain and the replacement cartridges are reasonably priced.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by DYH
          Hi all,

          I've been doing a lot of research on water filters. It seems like it's come down to either: Fluoride Removal>KDF/GAC>0.5 Micron Carbon Block or RO with a 0.5 Micron Carbon Block to reduce VOCs. Based on this report for where I live can someone tell me which method would be better? http://projects.nytimes.com/toxic-wa...5-east-bay-mud

          If I can get the simple under the sink filters to deal with this problem as effectively as possible then I'll do that, as RO is more difficult to maintain and wastes water etc, but of course having clean water for health is the primary concern, so I'll do what I have to do to achieve that.

          Thanks!
          How much of those things do you actually have in your water?

          Yes RO uses water to improve the quality of the water it makes but why do you think that "wastes water"? The human body doesn't require a shower a day, a vehicle doesn't require washing every week or month... clothes don't require washing after wearing them for just a few hours.... etc..

          And no combination of mechanical filters will produce the same quality as water from an RO.

          Comment


          • #6
            Benefits to installing a water treatment system such as reverse osmosis

            Benefits to installing a water treatment system for home applications include removing disagreeable tastes and odors, including objectionable chlorine, many chemicals and gases, and in some cases it can be effective against microorganisms. In particular, reverse osmosis is highly effective in removing up to 99% of contaminants in water. It removes several impurities from water such as total dissolved solids, turbidity, asbestos, lead and other toxic heavy metals, radium, and many dissolved organics. The process will also remove chlorinated pesticides and most heavier-weight VOCs.
            Last edited by Andy CWS; 07-13-2010, 01:37 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Great link providing.
              Very useful link.
              Thanks for sharing it.

              Comment

              Working...
              X